Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Control Groups | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Decoding (Reading) | 1 |
| Environmental Influences | 1 |
| Etiology | 1 |
| Genetics | 1 |
| Individual Differences | 1 |
| Intervals | 1 |
| Listening Comprehension | 1 |
| Reading Ability | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Betjemann, Rebecca S. | 1 |
| DeFries, John C. | 1 |
| Keenan, Janice M. | 1 |
| Olson, Richard K. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Colorado | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Gray Oral Reading Test | 1 |
| Peabody Individual… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkBetjemann, Rebecca S.; Keenan, Janice M.; Olson, Richard K.; DeFries, John C. – Scientific Studies of Reading, 2011
Does the choice of test for assessing reading comprehension influence the outcome of genetic analyses? A twin design compared two types of reading comprehension tests classified as primarily associated with word decoding (RC-D) or listening comprehension (RC-LC). For both types of tests, the overall genetic influence is high and nearly identical.…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Listening Comprehension, Siblings, Genetics
