Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Bayesian Statistics | 2 |
Bias | 2 |
Classification | 2 |
Error Patterns | 2 |
Memory | 2 |
Models | 2 |
Spatial Ability | 2 |
Cues | 1 |
English Literature | 1 |
Expertise | 1 |
Geographic Location | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Holden, Mark P. | 2 |
Newcombe, Nora S. | 2 |
Shipley, Thomas F. | 2 |
Curby, Kim M. | 1 |
Resnick, Ilyse | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Holden, Mark P.; Newcombe, Nora S.; Resnick, Ilyse; Shipley, Thomas F. – Cognitive Science, 2016
Memory for spatial location is typically biased, with errors trending toward the center of a surrounding region. According to the category adjustment model (CAM), this bias reflects the optimal, Bayesian combination of fine-grained and categorical representations of a location. However, there is disagreement about whether categories are malleable.…
Descriptors: Memory, Spatial Ability, Bias, Bayesian Statistics
Holden, Mark P.; Curby, Kim M.; Newcombe, Nora S.; Shipley, Thomas F. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2010
Memories for spatial locations often show systematic errors toward the central value of the surrounding region. This bias has been explained using a Bayesian model in which fine-grained and categorical information are combined (Huttenlocher, Hedges, & Duncan, 1991). However, experiments testing this model have largely used locations contained in…
Descriptors: Memory, Spatial Ability, Geographic Location, Classification