Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 3 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 6 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 7 |
Descriptor
| Oral Reading | 7 |
| Reading Fluency | 7 |
| Reading Tests | 7 |
| Elementary School Students | 6 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 5 |
| Grade 2 | 5 |
| Grade 3 | 5 |
| Grade 4 | 5 |
| Scores | 5 |
| Scoring | 5 |
| Curriculum Based Assessment | 4 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Nese, Joseph F. T. | 7 |
| Kamata, Akihito | 5 |
| Alonzo, Julie | 2 |
| Kahn, Josh | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 7 |
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 3 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 6 |
| Early Childhood Education | 5 |
| Grade 2 | 5 |
| Grade 3 | 5 |
| Grade 4 | 5 |
| Intermediate Grades | 5 |
| Primary Education | 5 |
Audience
Location
| Oregon | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 1 |
| easyCBM | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkNese, Joseph F. T.; Kamata, Akihito – School Psychology, 2021
Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency (CBM-R) is widely used across the United States as a strong indicator of comprehension and overall reading achievement, but has several limitations including errors in administration and large standard errors of measurement. The purpose of this study is to compare scoring methods and passage…
Descriptors: Curriculum Based Assessment, Oral Reading, Reading Fluency, Reading Tests
Download full textNese, Joseph F. T. – AERA Open, 2022
Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency (CBM-R) is used as an indicator of reading proficiency, and to measure at risk students' response to reading interventions to help ensure effective instruction. The purpose of this study was to compare model-based words read correctly per minute (WCPM) scores (computerized oral reading…
Descriptors: Reading Tests, Oral Reading, Reading Fluency, Curriculum Based Assessment
Nese, Joseph F. T. – Grantee Submission, 2022
Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency (CBM-R) is used as an indicator of reading proficiency, and to measure at risk students' response to reading interventions to help ensure effective instruction. The purpose of this study was to compare model-based words read correctly per minute (WCPM) scores (computerized oral reading…
Descriptors: Reading Tests, Oral Reading, Reading Fluency, Curriculum Based Assessment
Nese, Joseph F. T.; Kamata, Akihito – Grantee Submission, 2020
Automatic speech recognition (ASR) can be used to score oral reading fuency (ORF) assessments to ameliorate current inadequacies (e.g., administration errors, high opportunity cost), and represents an important part of a larger solution to improve traditional ORF. But more research is needed on how ASR performs for diverse student groups. The…
Descriptors: Oral Reading, Reading Fluency, Accuracy, Student Diversity
Nese, Joseph F. T.; Alonzo, Julie; Kamata, Akihito – Grantee Submission, 2016
The purpose of this study was to compare traditional oral reading fluency (ORF) measures to a computerized oral reading evaluation (CORE) system that uses speech recognition software. We applied a mixed model approach with two within-subject variables to test the mean WCPM score differences and the error rates between: passage length (25, 50, 85,…
Descriptors: Text Structure, Oral Reading, Reading Fluency, Reading Tests
Nese, Joseph F. T.; Kamata, Akihito; Alonzo, Julie – Grantee Submission, 2015
Assessing reading fluency is critical because it functions as an indicator of comprehension and overall reading achievement. Although theory and research demonstrate the importance of ORF proficiency, traditional ORF assessment practices are lacking as sensitive measures of progress for educators to make instructional decisions. The purpose of…
Descriptors: Oral Reading, Reading Fluency, Accuracy, Reading Rate
Nese, Joseph F. T.; Kahn, Josh; Kamata, Akihito – Grantee Submission, 2017
Despite prevalent use and practical application, the current and standard assessment of oral reading fluency (ORF) presents considerable limitations which reduces its validity in estimating growth and monitoring student progress, including: (a) high cost of implementation; (b) tenuous passage equivalence; and (c) bias, large standard error, and…
Descriptors: Automation, Speech, Recognition (Psychology), Scores
