Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Ethics | 2 |
| Evaluators | 2 |
| Stakeholders | 2 |
| Case Studies | 1 |
| Competence | 1 |
| Content Analysis | 1 |
| Employees | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Evaluation Problems | 1 |
| Evaluation Utilization | 1 |
| Human Dignity | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Morris, Michael | 2 |
| Posavac, Emil | 1 |
| Russ-Eft, Darlene | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkMorris, Michael – American Journal of Evaluation, 2011
This essay explores the contributions of "Evaluation Practice" and the "American Journal of Evaluation" to our understanding of evaluation ethics. The review is organized according to the five Guiding Principles for Evaluators (Systematic Inquiry, Competence, Integrity/Honesty, Respect for People, and Responsibilities for General and Public…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Ethics, Inquiry, Systems Approach
Peer reviewedMorris, Michael; Posavac, Emil; Russ-Eft, Darlene – American Journal of Evaluation, 1999
The article and commentary in this special section consider the ethical implications of a remark by an employee in a business being evaluated that employees have been advised to make the program look good. Explores the implications for the evaluation and its usefulness. (SLD)
Descriptors: Employees, Ethics, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems
