Descriptor
College Faculty | 3 |
Faculty Evaluation | 3 |
Faculty Promotion | 3 |
Higher Education | 3 |
Tenure | 3 |
Scholarship | 2 |
Administrative Policy | 1 |
Age Differences | 1 |
Aging in Academia | 1 |
Confidential Records | 1 |
Court Litigation | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Mooney, Carolyn J. | 3 |
Lederman, Douglas | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Mooney, Carolyn J. – Chronicle of Higher Education, 1990
Concerns about changing standards of scholarship prompted the University of Arizona to bar tenured professors no longer active in their disciplines, and not meeting current institutional standards for tenure, from evaluating colleagues for tenure and promotion. (MSE)
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, College Faculty, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation
Lederman, Douglas; Mooney, Carolyn J. – Chronicle of Higher Education, 1995
The August 1994 Ohio Supreme Court ruling opening state college and university tenure and promotion documents to the public allows examination of the faculty evaluation process. A review of 48 tenure cases at Ohio State University, which included interviews with scholars and officials, is presented. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Confidential Records, Court Litigation, Disclosure
Mooney, Carolyn J. – Chronicle of Higher Education, 1990
Hoping to gain prestige and financial support for research, many four-year institutions have toughened faculty tenure and promotion standards to require more and better research. Some older faculty have been surpassed in salary and perquisites by younger, more aggressive scholars. Morale problems and concern over evaluation criteria have resulted.…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Aging in Academia, College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria