Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Item Response Theory | 6 |
Models | 6 |
Bayesian Statistics | 2 |
Simulation | 2 |
Test Items | 2 |
Adaptive Testing | 1 |
Behavior Problems | 1 |
Cheating | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Computation | 1 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Meijer, Rob R. | 6 |
Glas, Cees A. W. | 2 |
Baneke, Joost J. | 1 |
Nering, Michael L. | 1 |
Smits, Iris A. M. | 1 |
Tendeiro, Jorge N. | 1 |
Timmerman, Marieke E. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 5 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Maryland | 1 |
Netherlands | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Smits, Iris A. M.; Timmerman, Marieke E.; Meijer, Rob R. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2012
The assessment of the number of dimensions and the dimensionality structure of questionnaire data is important in scale evaluation. In this study, the authors evaluate two dimensionality assessment procedures in the context of Mokken scale analysis (MSA), using a so-called fixed lowerbound. The comparative simulation study, covering various…
Descriptors: Simulation, Measures (Individuals), Program Effectiveness, Item Response Theory
Tendeiro, Jorge N.; Meijer, Rob R. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2012
This article extends the work by Armstrong and Shi on CUmulative SUM (CUSUM) person-fit methodology. The authors present new theoretical considerations concerning the use of CUSUM person-fit statistics based on likelihood ratios for the purpose of detecting cheating and random guessing by individual test takers. According to the Neyman-Pearson…
Descriptors: Cheating, Individual Testing, Adaptive Testing, Statistics

Glas, Cees A. W.; Meijer, Rob R. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2003
Presents a Bayesian approach to the evaluation of person fit in item response theory (IRT) models. Works the procedure in detail for the three parameter normal ogive model, but shows that the procedure can be generalized to many other IRT models. (SLD)
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Goodness of Fit, Item Response Theory, Models

Nering, Michael L.; Meijer, Rob R. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1998
Compared the person-response function (PRF) method for identifying examinees who respond to test items in a manner divergent from the underlying test model to the "l(z)" index of Drasgow and others (1985). Although performance of the "l(z)" index was superior in most cases, the PRF was useful in some conditions. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Item Response Theory, Models, Responses
Glas, Cees A. W.; Meijer, Rob R. – 2001
A Bayesian approach to the evaluation of person fit in item response theory (IRT) models is presented. In a posterior predictive check, the observed value on a discrepancy variable is positioned in its posterior distribution. In a Bayesian framework, a Markov Chain Monte Carlo procedure can be used to generate samples of the posterior distribution…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Item Response Theory, Markov Processes, Models
Meijer, Rob R.; Baneke, Joost J. – Psychological Methods, 2004
The authors discuss the applicability of nonparametric item response theory (IRT) models to the construction and psychometric analysis of personality and psychopathology scales, and they contrast these models with parametric IRT models. They describe the fit of nonparametric IRT to the Depression content scale of the Minnesota Multiphasic…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Psychopathology, Personality Assessment, Nonparametric Statistics