NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
An Investigation of Concurrent Validity of Fidelity of Implementation Measures at Initial Years of Implementation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Direct linkDirect link
Khoury, Caitlin Rasplica; McIntosh, Kent; Hoselton, Robert – Remedial and Special Education, 2019
Fidelity of implementation of school practices is crucial to student outcomes. Several types of tools, including self-assessments, are available for measuring fidelity, but little is known regarding the relation of self-assessments of fidelity to fidelity instruments completed with the support of external experts, specifically, during the first…
Descriptors: Validity, Fidelity, Program Implementation, Self Evaluation (Individuals)
Factor Validation of a Fidelity of Implementation Measure for Social Behavior Systems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Direct linkDirect link
Massar, Michelle M.; McIntosh, Kent; Mercer, Sterett H. – Remedial and Special Education, 2019
Assessing fidelity of implementation of school-based interventions is a critical factor in successful implementation and sustainability. The Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) was developed as a comprehensive measure of all three tiers of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS) and is intended to measure the extent to…
Descriptors: Fidelity, Intervention, Program Implementation, Positive Behavior Supports
Predicting Latency of Reaching Adequate Implementation of Tier I Schoolwide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Direct linkDirect link
Nese, Rhonda N. T.; Nese, Joseph F. T.; McIntosh, Kent; Mercer, Sterett H.; Kittelman, Angus – Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2019
In this study, longitudinal data from 708 schools across five states in the continental United States were analyzed to measure the time between initial training and adequate implementation of Tier I Schoolwide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports over 5 years and the extent to which it varied by school characteristics. Results indicated…
Descriptors: Positive Behavior Supports, Intervention, Institutional Characteristics, Suburban Schools
Comparability of Fidelity Measures for Assessing Tier 1 School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Direct linkDirect link
Mercer, Sterett H.; McIntosh, Kent; Hoselton, Robert – Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2017
Several reliable and valid fidelity surveys are commonly used to assess Tier 1 implementation in School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS); however, differences across surveys complicate consequential decisions regarding school implementation status when multiple measures are compared. To address this concern, the current…
Descriptors: Positive Behavior Supports, Intervention, Comparative Analysis, Fidelity
Predicting Abandonment of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nese, Rhonda; McIntosh, Kent; Nese, Joseph; Hoselton, Robert; Bloom, Jerry; Johnson, Nanci; Richter, Mary; Phillips, Danielle; Ghemraoui, Adam – Behavioral Disorders, 2016
This study examines predictors of abandonment of evidence-based practices through descriptive analyses of extant state-level training data, fidelity of implementation data, and nationally reported school demographic data across 915 schools in three states implementing school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS). Schools…
Descriptors: Positive Behavior Supports, Predictor Variables, Program Implementation, Fidelity
Do Schools with Adequate Tier I SWPBIS Implementation Have Stronger Implementation at Tiers II and III?
Direct linkDirect link
Kim, Jerin; McIntosh, Kent; Hoselton, Rob – Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, 2014
To illustrate the three-tiered model, Tier I (universal) supports are delivered similarly to all students in all settings, and at least 80% of students are expected to respond to these supports. Beyond universal supports, Tier II (targeted) supports serve 10-15% of students whose behavior does not respond to Tier I supports. A small group of…
Descriptors: Positive Behavior Supports, Program Implementation, Student Behavior, Behavior Problems