Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Classification | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Experimental Psychology | 1 |
| Memory | 1 |
| Prediction | 1 |
| Recall (Psychology) | 1 |
| Visual Stimuli | 1 |
| Word Lists | 1 |
Source
| Journal of Experimental… | 1 |
Author
| Bugg, Julie M. | 1 |
| Cahill, Michael J. | 1 |
| McDaniel, Mark A. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Missouri | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMcDaniel, Mark A.; Cahill, Michael J.; Bugg, Julie M. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2016
How does orthographic distinctiveness affect recall of structured (categorized) word lists? On one theory, enhanced item-specific information (e.g., more distinct encoding) in concert with robust relational information (e.g., categorical information) optimally supports free recall. This predicts that for categorically structured lists,…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Recall (Psychology), Word Lists, Cognitive Processes
