Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computational Linguistics | 1 |
| Connected Discourse | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Discourse Analysis | 1 |
| Psychology | 1 |
| Readability Formulas | 1 |
| Rhetoric | 1 |
| Validity | 1 |
Source
| Discourse Processes: A… | 1 |
Author
| Graesser, Arthur C. | 1 |
| Louwerse, Max M. | 1 |
| McCarthy, Philip M. | 1 |
| McNamara, Danielle S. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 1 |
| Flesch Reading Ease Formula | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMcNamara, Danielle S.; Louwerse, Max M.; McCarthy, Philip M.; Graesser, Arthur C. – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
This study addresses the need in discourse psychology for computational techniques that analyze text on multiple levels of cohesion and text difficulty. Discourse psychologists often investigate phenomena related to discourse processing using lengthy texts containing multiple paragraphs, as opposed to single word and sentence stimuli.…
Descriptors: Computational Linguistics, Connected Discourse, Difficulty Level, Rhetoric
