NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McCabe, Donald L.; Pavela, Gary – Change, 2004
This document is a revision of the original "Ten Principles," that were published in 1997, along with work on modified honor codes. Modified honor codes have encouraged students to take the lead in setting higher ethical standards for their peers.
Descriptors: Teacher Role, Student Behavior, Standards, Cheating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McCabe, Donald L.; Bowers, William J. – Journal of College Student Development, 1994
Compared self-reported cheating data obtained from male undergraduate college students in 1963 (n=579) and in 1991 (n=2,240). Data from both samples revealed significantly lower levels of self-reported cheating at schools with honor codes. Other findings suggest that media reports of dramatic increases in cheating may well be unfounded. (Author/NB)
Descriptors: Cheating, Codes of Ethics, College Students, Comparative Analysis
McCabe, Donald L. – Liberal Education, 2005
Just as the African tribal maxim proclaims that "it takes a village to raise a child," this author argues that it takes the whole campus community--students, faculty, and administrators--to effectively educate a student. The goal of educators should not be simply to reduce cheating, but to find innovative and creative ways to use academic…
Descriptors: Integrity, Educational Objectives, Educational Opportunities, Cheating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McCabe, Donald L.; Trevino, Linda Klebe – Change, 1996
Although there are new forms of cheating among college students, particularly technology-related, overall cheating has increased only modestly. Significant increases in test cheating are occurring among women and in unpermitted collaboration among students on written work. Also, students report engaging in a wider variety of test-cheating…
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Cheating, College Instruction, College Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McCabe, Donald L.; Bowers, William J. – NASPA Journal, 1996
Compares the self-reported cheating behaviors of fraternity and non-fraternity members and the relation between student cheating and the overall level of greek membership on campus. Fraternity and sorority members cheat more than non-members but cheating would not change dramatically if fraternities or sororities did not exist on campus. (RJM)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Cheating, College Environment, College Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McCabe, Donald L.; Trevino, Linda Klebe – Research in Higher Education, 1997
A survey of 1,793 students at nine state universities found cheating was influenced by a number of characteristics of individuals, including age, sex, and grade point average, and contextual factors, including level of cheating among peers, peer disapproval of cheating, fraternity/sorority membership, and perceived severity of penalties for…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Age Differences, Behavior Patterns, Cheating