The Peer Review Process Used to Evaluate Manuscripts Submitted to Academic Journals: Interjudgmental Reliability.

Marsh, Herbert W.; Ball, Samuel

Notes FAQ Contact Us

Back to results

Peer reviewed

ERIC Number: EJ393052

Record Type: Journal

Publication Date: 1989

Pages: N/A

Abstractor: N/A

ISBN: N/A

ISSN: N/A

EISSN: N/A

The Peer Review Process Used to Evaluate Manuscripts Submitted to Academic Journals: Interjudgmental Reliability.

Marsh, Herbert W.; Ball, Samuel

Journal of Experimental Education, v57 n2 p151-69 Win 1989

Agreement between two independent reviews of each of 278 manuscripts was compared on an overall recommendation and on specific rating items. Agreement between reviewers on separate dimensions, the unweighted sum of the dimensions, and various weighted sums was no better than that for the overall recommendation itself. (SLD)

Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Factor Analysis, Interrater Reliability, Manuscripts, Multitrait Multimethod Techniques, Peer Evaluation, Periodicals, Research Reports, Statistical Data, Writing Evaluation

Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research

Education Level: N/A

Audience: N/A

Language: English

Sponsor: N/A

Authoring Institution: N/A

Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A