Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Age Differences | 1 |
| Aggression | 1 |
| At Risk Students | 1 |
| Bullying | 1 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Depression (Psychology) | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Factor Analysis | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Gender Differences | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Educational… | 1 |
Author
| Craven, Rhonda G. | 1 |
| Hamilton, Linda R. | 1 |
| Marsh, Herbert W. | 1 |
| Morin, Alexandre J. S. | 1 |
| Nagengast, Benjamin | 1 |
| Parada, Roberto H. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Australia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMarsh, Herbert W.; Nagengast, Benjamin; Morin, Alexandre J. S.; Parada, Roberto H.; Craven, Rhonda G.; Hamilton, Linda R. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2011
Existing research posits multiple dimensions of bullying and victimization but has not identified well-differentiated facets of these constructs that meet standards of good measurement: goodness of fit, measurement invariance, lack of differential item functioning, and well-differentiated factors that are not so highly correlated as to detract…
Descriptors: Locus of Control, Test Bias, Bullying, Structural Equation Models
