Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Affirmative Action | 3 |
Court Litigation | 3 |
Admission Criteria | 2 |
Advocacy | 2 |
College Admission | 2 |
Constitutional Law | 2 |
Race | 2 |
Decision Making | 1 |
Educational Policy | 1 |
Federal Courts | 1 |
Geographic Location | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Garces, Liliana M. | 3 |
Horn, Catherine L. | 3 |
Marin, Patricia | 3 |
Miksch, Karen | 2 |
Yun, John T. | 2 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Texas | 1 |
Texas (Austin) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Fisher v University of Texas… | 1 |
Fourteenth Amendment | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Garces, Liliana M.; Marin, Patricia; Horn, Catherine L. – Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 2021
As the fight over diversity-oriented postsecondary strategies like race-conscious admissions (commonly known as affirmative action) continues to play out in the courts with new legal cases, it is critical to better understand the ways policy actors in this arena are leveraging social science research and other types of sources in their organized…
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, College Admission, Court Litigation, Admission Criteria
Marin, Patricia; Horn, Catherine L.; Miksch, Karen; Garces, Liliana M.; Yun, John T. – Education Policy Analysis Archives, 2018
As the political arena becomes increasingly polarized, the legal arena is playing a more important role in the creation of education policy in the United States. One critical stage in the legal process for such efforts is at briefing where "amici curiae," or friends-of-the-court, may introduce additional arguments for the court to…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Affirmative Action, Higher Education, College Admission
Horn, Catherine L.; Marin, Patricia; Garces, Liliana M.; Miksch, Karen; Yun, John T. – Educational Policy, 2020
Different from more traditional policy-making avenues, the courts provide an antipolitical arena that does not require broad agreement from various constituents for policy enactment. Seeking to guide court decisions on these policy issues, individuals and organizations have filed "amicus" briefs that increasingly include social science…
Descriptors: Educational Policy, Policy Formation, Court Litigation, Social Science Research