Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Memory | 6 |
Silent Reading | 6 |
Word Lists | 5 |
Foreign Countries | 4 |
Oral Reading | 4 |
College Students | 3 |
Statistical Analysis | 3 |
Cognitive Processes | 2 |
Cues | 2 |
Mnemonics | 2 |
Recall (Psychology) | 2 |
More ▼ |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Research | 6 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 5 |
Postsecondary Education | 3 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Pritchard, Verena E.; Heron-Delaney, Michelle; Malone, Stephanie A.; MacLeod, Colin M. – Child Development, 2020
The production effect--whereby reading words aloud improves memory for those words relative to reading them silently--was investigated in two experiments with 7- to 10-year-old children residing in Brisbane, Australia. Experiment 1 (n = 41) involved familiar printed words, with words read aloud or silently appearing either in mixed- or…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Children, Oral Reading, Silent Reading
Jonker, Tanya R.; Wammes, Jeffrey D.; MacLeod, Colin M. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2019
Drawing a picture of the referent of a word produces considerably better recall and recognition of that word than does a baseline condition, such as repeatedly writing the word, a phenomenon referred to as the drawing effect. Although the drawing effect has been the focus of much recent research, it is not yet clear what underlies the beneficial…
Descriptors: Freehand Drawing, Recall (Psychology), Word Recognition, Memory
Forrin, Noah D.; Groot, Brianna; MacLeod, Colin M. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2016
It can be difficult to judge the effectiveness of encoding techniques in a within-subject design. Consider the "production effect"--the finding that words read aloud are better remembered than words read silently. In the absence of a baseline, a within-subject production effect in a mixed study list could reflect a benefit of reading…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Oral Reading, Silent Reading, Word Lists
Jonker, Tanya R.; MacLeod, Colin M. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2015
McDaniel and Bugg (2008) proposed that relatively uncommon stimuli and encoding tasks encourage elaborative encoding of individual items (item-specific processing), whereas relatively typical or common encoding tasks encourage encoding of associations among list items (relational processing). It is this relational processing that is thought to…
Descriptors: Memory, Cognitive Processes, Semantics, Interference (Learning)
MacLeod, Colin M.; Gopie, Nigel; Hourihan, Kathleen L.; Neary, Karen R.; Ozubko, Jason D. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2010
In 8 recognition experiments, we investigated the "production effect"--the fact that producing a word aloud during study, relative to simply reading a word silently, improves explicit memory. Experiments 1, 2, and 3 showed the effect to be restricted to within-subject, mixed-list designs in which some individual words are spoken aloud at study.…
Descriptors: Oral Reading, Silent Reading, Differences, Memory
Ozubko, Jason D.; MacLeod, Colin M. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2010
The production effect is the substantial benefit to memory of having studied information aloud as opposed to silently. MacLeod, Gopie, Hourihan, Neary, and Ozubko (2010) have explained this enhancement by suggesting that a word studied aloud acquires a distinctive encoding record and that recollecting this record supports identifying a word…
Descriptors: Prediction, Memory, Experiments, Coding