Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Factor Structure | 7 |
Intelligence Tests | 7 |
Cognitive Ability | 4 |
Factor Analysis | 4 |
Adolescents | 2 |
Children | 2 |
Construct Validity | 2 |
Elementary Education | 2 |
Measures (Individuals) | 2 |
Test Reviews | 2 |
Test Validity | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Intelligence | 2 |
Journal of Psychoeducational… | 2 |
Psychology in the Schools | 1 |
School Psychology Review | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Research | 5 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Kaufman Assessment Battery… | 4 |
Wechsler Intelligence Scale… | 2 |
McCarthy Scales of Childrens… | 1 |
Wechsler Adult Intelligence… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Potvin, Deborah C. H.; Keith, Timothy Z.; Caemmerer, Jacqueline M.; Trundt, Katherine M. – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2015
With an age range from 3 to 13 years, the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition (KABC-II) offers an appealing option for the assessment of cognitive abilities for children. Although independent research has provided evidence of the construct validity of the KABC-II for school-age children, previous studies have rarely included an…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Factor Structure, Preschool Children, Cognitive Ability
Weiss, Lawrence G.; Keith, Timothy Z.; Zhu, Jianjun; Chen, Hsinyi – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2013
The purpose of this study was to determine the constructs measured by the WISC-IV and the consistency of measurement across large normative and clinical samples. Competing higher order four- and five-factor models were analyzed using the WISC-IV normative sample and clinical subjects. The four-factor solution is the model published with the test…
Descriptors: Measures (Individuals), Logical Thinking, Validity, Factor Analysis
Reynolds, Matthew R.; Keith, Timothy Z.; Beretvas, S. Natasha – Intelligence, 2010
Spearman's law of diminishing returns (SLODR) posits that at higher levels of general cognitive ability the general factor ("g") performs less well in explaining individual differences in cognitive test performance. Research has generally supported SLODR, but previous research has required the a priori division of respondents into…
Descriptors: Factor Structure, Cognitive Tests, Cognitive Ability, Individual Differences
Reynolds, Matthew R.; Keith, Timothy Z. – Intelligence, 2007
Spearman's "law of diminishing returns" or SLODR refers to a decrease in "g" saturation as ability level increases. SLODR has been demonstrated in a number of intellectual batteries but several important aspects of the phenomenon are not yet well understood. We investigated the presence of SLODR in the Kaufman Assessment…
Descriptors: Intelligence, Factor Analysis, Ability Grouping, Factor Structure
Witta, E. Lea; Keith, Timothy Z. – 1994
Although the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) is being rapidly replaced by the third edition of the WISC, questions concerning the construct validity of the WISC-R have not yet been resolved, including the number of factors it measures and whether the same constructs fit across all age levels. This study sought to…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Analysis of Covariance, Chi Square, Construct Validity

Keith, Timothy Z.; Bolen, Larry M. – Psychology in the Schools, 1980
The McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities (MSCA) General Cognitive Index provides a good measure of cognitive ability of exceptional children. The verbal and motor scales also seem valid. Interpretation of remaining scales should be made cautiously as scales may not accurately measure abilities of exceptional children. (Author/JAC)
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students, Exceptional Persons

Keith, Timothy Z. – School Psychology Review, 1985
Three levels from the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) standardization sample were randomly selected and their subtest score intercorrelations were subjected to factor analysis. The analyses yielded minor inconsistencies which suggest the instrument does not primarily measure simultaneous and sequential processing and achievement as…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Cognitive Processes, Correlation, Elementary Education