Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Correlation | 3 |
| Intelligence Tests | 3 |
| Factor Analysis | 2 |
| Test Validity | 2 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Cognitive Ability | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Counseling | 1 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Keith, Timothy Z. | 3 |
| Young, Stephanie R. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Kaufman Assessment Battery… | 1 |
| Wechsler Adult Intelligence… | 1 |
| Wechsler Intelligence Scale… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkYoung, Stephanie R.; Keith, Timothy Z. – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2020
The construct validity of the International Cognitive Ability Resource (ICAR) has yet to be investigated using a gold-standard individually administered intelligence battery. The present study used a convenience sample of 97 students to examine the respective relations between the ICAR16 and overall intelligence (g) and the Cattell-Horn-Carroll…
Descriptors: Test Validity, Adults, Intelligence Tests, Cognitive Ability
Peer reviewedKeith, Timothy Z. – School Psychology Quarterly, 1994
Offers alternative analyses and interpretations of Macmann and Barnett's research data and results. Contends that intelligence is complex and that intelligence testing is important component of school psychological practice. Discusses relation and frequent inconsistency between research and practice. (CRR)
Descriptors: Correlation, Counseling, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation
Peer reviewedKeith, Timothy Z. – School Psychology Review, 1985
Three levels from the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) standardization sample were randomly selected and their subtest score intercorrelations were subjected to factor analysis. The analyses yielded minor inconsistencies which suggest the instrument does not primarily measure simultaneous and sequential processing and achievement as…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Cognitive Processes, Correlation, Elementary Education
