Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
| Oral Reading | 2 |
| Reading Fluency | 2 |
| Reading Rate | 2 |
| Reading Tests | 2 |
| Scores | 2 |
| Scoring | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Audio Equipment | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| Error Patterns | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Grantee Submission | 2 |
Author
| Alonzo, Julie | 2 |
| Kamata, Akihito | 2 |
| Nese, Joseph F. T. | 2 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textNese, Joseph F. T.; Alonzo, Julie; Kamata, Akihito – Grantee Submission, 2016
The purpose of this study was to compare traditional oral reading fluency (ORF) measures to a computerized oral reading evaluation (CORE) system that uses speech recognition software. We applied a mixed model approach with two within-subject variables to test the mean WCPM score differences and the error rates between: passage length (25, 50, 85,…
Descriptors: Text Structure, Oral Reading, Reading Fluency, Reading Tests
Nese, Joseph F. T.; Kamata, Akihito; Alonzo, Julie – Grantee Submission, 2015
Assessing reading fluency is critical because it functions as an indicator of comprehension and overall reading achievement. Although theory and research demonstrate the importance of ORF proficiency, traditional ORF assessment practices are lacking as sensitive measures of progress for educators to make instructional decisions. The purpose of…
Descriptors: Oral Reading, Reading Fluency, Accuracy, Reading Rate
