Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Aphasia | 3 |
Item Response Theory | 3 |
Test Items | 3 |
Communication Disorders | 2 |
Difficulty Level | 2 |
Models | 2 |
Naming | 2 |
Psychometrics | 2 |
Scoring | 2 |
Adults | 1 |
Age Differences | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Fergadiotis, Gerasimos | 3 |
Hula, William D. | 3 |
Casilio, Marianne | 1 |
Dickey, Michael Walsh | 1 |
Fleegle, Mikala | 1 |
Kellough, Stacey | 1 |
Martin, Nadine | 1 |
Nicholson, Hannele | 1 |
Steel, Stacey | 1 |
Swiderski, Alexander | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Fergadiotis, Gerasimos; Casilio, Marianne; Dickey, Michael Walsh; Steel, Stacey; Nicholson, Hannele; Fleegle, Mikala; Swiderski, Alexander; Hula, William D. – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2023
Purpose: Item response theory (IRT) is a modern psychometric framework with several advantageous properties as compared with classical test theory. IRT has been successfully used to model performance on anomia tests in individuals with aphasia; however, all efforts to date have focused on noun production accuracy. The purpose of this study is to…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Psychometrics, Verbs, Naming
Fergadiotis, Gerasimos; Kellough, Stacey; Hula, William D. – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2015
Purpose: In this study, we investigated the fit of the Philadelphia Naming Test (PNT; Roach, Schwartz, Martin, Grewal, & Brecher, 1996) to an item-response-theory measurement model, estimated the precision of the resulting scores and item parameters, and provided a theoretical rationale for the interpretation of PNT overall scores by relating…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Scores, Difficulty Level, Test Items
Hula, William D.; Fergadiotis, Gerasimos; Martin, Nadine – American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2012
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify the most appropriate item response theory (IRT) measurement model for aphasia tests requiring 2-choice responses and to determine whether small samples are adequate for estimating such models. Method: Pyramids and Palm Trees (Howard & Patterson, 1992) test data that had been collected from…
Descriptors: Sample Size, Guessing (Tests), Aphasia, Item Response Theory