NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Houston, John P. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1977
When correlations between actual university classroom cheating behavior (multiple-choice answer copying) and pretest estimates of success, confidence, and test importance were studied answer copying correlated positively with estimates of success. Confidence in these estimates of success also correlated positively with answer copying, while…
Descriptors: Cheating, Failure, Multiple Choice Tests, Risk
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Houston, John P. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976
Two experiments investigated the amount and loci of multiple-choice examination answer copying as related to the spacing of students and the use of alternate test forms. (RC)
Descriptors: Cheating, Classroom Design, College Students, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Houston, John P. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1986
Two experiments with college psychology classes examined answer copying during multiple-choice examinations under conditions of free and assigned seating. More answer copying occurred in the free seating situation, not accountable for in terms of the idea that answer copiers prefer to sit in the rear of the room. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Cheating, Classroom Research, College Students, Discipline Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Houston, John P. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1983
Using an index of answer copying developed by Houston, it was found that rearranged questions alone did not reduce answer copying, whereas rearrangement of both questions and answers effectively eliminated detectable cheating. (Author)
Descriptors: Cheating, Higher Education, Measurement Techniques, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Houston, John P. – Research in Higher Education, 1976
Multiple-choice examination answer copying was indexed by a comparison of the numbers of items answered incorrectly, and in the same way, as adjacent and distant classmates. Significant copying occurred in an experiment where test performance contributed to course grade, but it did not occur when the test did not affect the grade. (Editor/LBH)
Descriptors: Cheating, Comparative Analysis, Grades (Scholastic), Higher Education