A Rejoinder to Stiles', Hoshmand's, and Tinsley's Comments about "A Guide to Conducting Consensual Qualitative Research.".

Hill, Clara E.; Williams, Elizabeth Nutt; Thompson, Barbara J.

Notes FAQ Contact Us

Back to results

Peer reviewed

ERIC Number: EJ557919

Record Type: Journal

Publication Date: 1997

Pages: N/A

Abstractor: N/A

ISBN: N/A

ISSN: ISSN-0011-0000

EISSN: N/A

A Rejoinder to Stiles', Hoshmand's, and Tinsley's Comments about "A Guide to Conducting Consensual Qualitative Research."

Hill, Clara E.; Williams, Elizabeth Nutt; Thompson, Barbara J.

Counseling Psychologist, v25 n4 p606-14 Oct 1997

Offers reactions to critiques of a proposed research model: consensual qualitative research (CQR). Clarifies the meaning of consensus, explicates the representativeness of samples, analyzes the limitations and advantages of self-report data, and explores the nature of truth. Explores theory and verification in CQR and compares CQR to other qualitative approaches. (RJM)

Descriptors: Counseling Psychology, Counseling Theories, Criticism, Protocol Analysis, Qualitative Research, Research Design, Research Methodology

Publication Type: Journal Articles; Opinion Papers

Education Level: N/A

Audience: N/A

Language: English

Sponsor: N/A

Authoring Institution: N/A

Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A