Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 2 |
| Confidence Testing | 2 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Evidence | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Measurement Techniques | 1 |
| Memory | 1 |
| Metacognition | 1 |
| Multiple Choice Tests | 1 |
| Psychology | 1 |
| Recognition (Psychology) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Higham, Philip A. | 2 |
| Hanczakowski, Maciej | 1 |
| Zawadzka, Katarzyna | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| United Kingdom (Wales) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkZawadzka, Katarzyna; Higham, Philip A.; Hanczakowski, Maciej – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2017
Two-alternative forced-choice recognition tests are commonly used to assess recognition accuracy that is uncontaminated by changes in bias. In such tests, participants are asked to endorse the studied item out of 2 presented alternatives. Participants may be further asked to provide confidence judgments for their recognition decisions. It is often…
Descriptors: Recognition (Psychology), Measurement Techniques, Confidence Testing, Memory
Higham, Philip A. – Learning and Instruction, 2013
A single experiment is reported in which introductory psychology students were administered a multiple-choice test on psychology with either 4 (n = 78) or 5 alternatives (n = 92) prior to any lectures being delivered. Two answers were generated for each question: a small answer consisting of their favorite alternative, and a large answer…
Descriptors: College Students, Student Evaluation, Psychology, Multiple Choice Tests
