NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Helwig, Charles C.; Yang, Shaogang; Tan, Dingliang; Liu, Chunqiong; Shao, Tiffany – Child Development, 2011
This research applied social domain theory to illuminate reasoning about the perceived legitimacy and limits of group decision making (majority rule) among adolescents from urban and rural China (N = 160). Study 1 revealed that adolescents from both urban and rural China judged group decision making as acceptable for both social conventional and…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Decision Making, Evaluative Thinking, Logical Thinking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Spence, Sarah; Helwig, Charles C. – Journal of Genetic Psychology, 2013
Children's, adolescents', and adults' (N = 96 7-8, 10-11, and 13-14-year-olds and university students) epistemological development and its relation to judgments and reasoning about teaching methods was examined. The domain (scientific or moral), nature of the topic (controversial or noncontroversial), and teaching method (direct instruction by…
Descriptors: Epistemology, Evaluative Thinking, Logical Thinking, Teaching Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Helwig, Charles C.; Jasiobedzka, Urszula – Child Development, 2001
Investigated 6-, 8-, and 10-year-olds' reasoning about laws and legal compliance. Found that children considered several factors in their judgments, including perceived justice of the law, its socially beneficial purpose, and potential for infringement on individual freedoms and rights. Found that children apply moral concepts of harm, rights, and…
Descriptors: Children, Compliance (Legal), Evaluation Criteria, Evaluative Thinking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Helwig, Charles C.; And Others – Child Development, 1995
Seventy-two children were presented with a series of stories involving psychological harm in a game context. Found that older children were more likely than younger ones to base their evaluations on intentions, or both intentions and consequences, and to take into account the recipient's perspective. Game context interacted differentially with…
Descriptors: Affective Behavior, Age Differences, Childrens Games, Emotional Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Helwig, Charles C.; Kim, Susan – Child Development, 1999
Examined elementary students' evaluations of decision-making procedures in different social contexts. Found that consensus was preferred in peer and family contexts and authority-based procedures were preferred for school curricular decisions. Older children were more likely than younger to consider how children's limited knowledge and competence…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Children, Competence, Context Effect
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Helwig, Charles C. – Child Development, 1998
Used cases of democratic and non-democratic governmental systems and freedom of speech to investigate 6- to 11-year-olds' notions of political fairness and democracy. Found that political fairness concepts were applied at all ages to evaluate governmental systems and reject non-democratic alternatives. Older children were more likely than younger…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Childhood Attitudes, Children, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Helwig, Charles C.; Arnold, Mary Louise; Tan, Dingliang; Boyd, Dwight – Child Development, 2003
This study explored judgments and reasoning of Chinese 13- to 18-year-olds regarding making decisions involving children in peer, family, and school contexts. Findings indicated that judgments and reasoning about decision-making varied by social context and by the decision under consideration. Evaluations of procedures became more differentiated…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Adult Child Relationship, Age Differences, Childrens Rights