Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Accountability | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Comprehension | 1 |
| Elementary School Science | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| Epistemology | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Grade 2 | 1 |
| History | 1 |
| Knowledge Level | 1 |
| Science Curriculum | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Science Education | 1 |
Author
| Coffey, Janet E. | 1 |
| Hammer, David | 1 |
| Hutchison, Paul | 1 |
| Russ, Rosemary S. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 2 | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkRuss, Rosemary S.; Coffey, Janet E.; Hammer, David; Hutchison, Paul – Science Education, 2009
When teachers or students assess the quality of ideas in science classes, they do so mostly based on "textbook correctness"; ideas are good to the extent they align with or lead to the content as presented in the textbook or curriculum. Such appeals to authority are at odds with the values and practices within the disciplines of science. There has…
Descriptors: Textbooks, Epistemology, Science Education, Science Curriculum
