Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Item Response Theory | 3 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Item Analysis | 2 |
| Test Items | 2 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Computation | 1 |
| Computer Simulation | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Diagnostic Tests | 1 |
| Evaluators | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Hambleton, Ronald K. | 3 |
| Baldwin, Peter | 1 |
| Clauser, Jerome C. | 1 |
| Yavuz, Guler | 1 |
| Yoo, Hanwook | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| United States Medical… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkYoo, Hanwook; Hambleton, Ronald K. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2019
Item analysis is an integral part of operational test development and is typically conducted within two popular statistical frameworks: classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT). In this digital ITEMS module, Hanwook Yoo and Ronald K. Hambleton provide an accessible overview of operational item analysis approaches within these…
Descriptors: Item Analysis, Item Response Theory, Guidelines, Test Construction
Yavuz, Guler; Hambleton, Ronald K. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2017
Application of MIRT modeling procedures is dependent on the quality of parameter estimates provided by the estimation software and techniques used. This study investigated model parameter recovery of two popular MIRT packages, BMIRT and flexMIRT, under some common measurement conditions. These packages were specifically selected to investigate the…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Models, Comparative Analysis, Computer Software
Clauser, Jerome C.; Hambleton, Ronald K.; Baldwin, Peter – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2017
The Angoff standard setting method relies on content experts to review exam items and make judgments about the performance of the minimally proficient examinee. Unfortunately, at times content experts may have gaps in their understanding of specific exam content. These gaps are particularly likely to occur when the content domain is broad and/or…
Descriptors: Scores, Item Analysis, Classification, Decision Making
