Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Pain | 5 |
Patients | 4 |
Brain | 2 |
Chronic Illness | 2 |
Classification | 2 |
Head Injuries | 2 |
Psychological Patterns | 2 |
Response Style (Tests) | 2 |
Simulation | 2 |
Cognitive Ability | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Assessment | 5 |
Author
Bianchini, Kevin J. | 5 |
Greve, Kevin W. | 5 |
Etherton, Joseph L. | 3 |
Heinly, Matthew T. | 3 |
Ciota, Megan A. | 2 |
Black, F. William | 1 |
Curtis, Kelly L. | 1 |
Love, Jeffrey M. | 1 |
Meyers, John E. | 1 |
Ord, Jonathan S. | 1 |
Springer, Steven | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 5 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Minnesota Multiphasic… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Greve, Kevin W.; Curtis, Kelly L.; Bianchini, Kevin J.; Ord, Jonathan S. – Assessment, 2009
This two-part study sought to determine the equivalence of the California Verbal Learning Tests (CVLT-1 and CVLT-2) in the detection of malingering in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and chronic pain. Part 1 compared a variety of scores from the two versions in carefully matched patient groups. Part 2 used criterion groups (known-groups) methodology…
Descriptors: Patients, Verbal Learning, Verbal Tests, Pain
Bianchini, Kevin J.; Etherton, Joseph L.; Greve, Kevin W.; Heinly, Matthew T.; Meyers, John E. – Assessment, 2008
The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of "Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory" 2nd edition (MMPI-2; Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989) validity indicators in the detection of malingering in clinical patients with chronic pain using a hybrid clinical-known groups/simulator design. The…
Descriptors: Validity, Classification, Pain, Patients
Greve, Kevin W.; Springer, Steven; Bianchini, Kevin J.; Black, F. William; Heinly, Matthew T.; Love, Jeffrey M.; Swift, Douglas A.; Ciota, Megan A. – Assessment, 2007
This study examined the sensitivity and false-positive error rate of reliable digit span (RDS) and the WAIS-III Digit Span (DS) scaled score in persons alleging toxic exposure and determined whether error rates differed from published rates in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and chronic pain (CP). Data were obtained from the files of 123 persons…
Descriptors: Patients, Pain, Classification, Head Injuries
Etherton, Joseph L.; Bianchini, Kevin J.; Greve, Kevin W.; Heinly, Matthew T. – Assessment, 2005
The reliable digit span (RDS) performance of chronic pain patients with unambiguous spinal injuries and no evidence of exaggeration or response bias (n = 53) was compared to that of chronic pain patients meeting criteria for definite malingered neurocognitive dysfunction (n = 35), and a group of nonmalingering moderate-severe traumatic brain…
Descriptors: Response Style (Tests), Patients, Pain, Psychological Evaluation
Etherton, Joseph L.; Bianchini, Kevin J.; Ciota, Megan A.; Greve, Kevin W. – Assessment, 2005
Reliable Digit Span (RDS) is an indicator used to assess the validity of cognitive test performance. Scores of 7 or lower suggest poor effort or negative response bias. The possibility that RDS scores are also affected by pain has not been addressed thus potentially threatening RDS specificity. The current study used cold pressor-induced pain to…
Descriptors: Response Style (Tests), Simulation, Intelligence Tests, Pain