NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 20 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Marchak, Kristan A.; Bayly, Bryana; Umscheid, Valerie; Gelman, Susan A. – Journal of Cognition and Development, 2020
When reasoning about a representation (e.g., a toy lion), children often engage in "iconic realism," whereby representations are reported to have properties of their real-life referents. The present studies examined an inverse difficulty that we dub "representational disregard": overlooking (i.e., disregarding) a…
Descriptors: Young Children, Adults, Age Differences, Logical Thinking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Labotka, Danielle; Gelman, Susan A. – Developmental Psychology, 2020
Although children's use of speech registers such as Baby Talk is well documented, little is known about their understanding of Foreigner Talk, a register addressed to non-native speakers. In Study 1, 4- to 8-year-old children and adults (N = 125) heard 4 registers (Foreigner Talk, Baby Talk, Peer Talk, and Teacher Talk) and predicted who would…
Descriptors: Second Language Learning, Child Language, Speech Communication, Language Styles
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Roberts, Steven O.; Gelman, Susan A. – Developmental Psychology, 2016
Recent research questions whether children conceptualize race as stable. We examined participants' beliefs about the relative stability of race and emotion, a temporary feature. Participants were White adults and children ages 5-6 and 9-10 (Study 1) and racial minority children ages 5-6 (Study 2). Participants were presented with target children…
Descriptors: Race, Whites, Children, Adults
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Leslie, Sarah-Jane; Gelman, Susan A. – Cognitive Psychology, 2012
Generics are sentences such as "ravens are black" and "tigers are striped", which express generalizations concerning kinds. Quantified statements such as "all tigers are striped" or "most ravens are black" also express generalizations, but unlike generics, they specify how many members of the kind have the property in question. Recently, some…
Descriptors: Evidence, Sentences, Preschool Children, Adults
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rhodes, Marjorie; Brickman, Daniel; Gelman, Susan A. – Cognition, 2008
Evaluating whether a limited sample of evidence provides a good basis for induction is a critical cognitive task. We hypothesized that whereas adults evaluate the inductive strength of samples containing multiple pieces of evidence by attending to the relations among the exemplars (e.g., sample diversity), six-year-olds would attend to the degree…
Descriptors: Logical Thinking, Thinking Skills, Animals, Classification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Frazier, Brandy N.; Gelman, Susan A.; Kaciroti, Niko; Russell, Joshua W.; Lumeng, Julie C. – Developmental Science, 2012
This research investigates children's use of social categories in their food selection. Across three studies, we presented preschoolers with sets of photographs that contrasted food-eating models with different characteristics, including model gender, race (Black, White), age (child or adult), and/or expression (acceptance or rejection of the…
Descriptors: Food, Eating Habits, Decision Making, Preschool Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rhodes, Marjorie; Gelman, Susan A.; Brickman, Daniel – Developmental Science, 2010
Two studies compared children's attention to sample composition--whether a sample provides a diverse representation of a category of interest--during teacher-led and learner-driven learning contexts. In Study 1 (n = 48), 5-year-olds attended to sample composition to make inferences about biological properties only when samples were presented by a…
Descriptors: Recall (Psychology), Inferences, Writing (Composition), Teaching Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Frazier, Brandy N.; Gelman, Susan A.; Wellman, Henry M. – Child Development, 2009
This research examined children's questions and the reactions to the answers they receive in conversations with adults. If children actively seek explanatory knowledge, they should react differently depending on whether they receive a causal explanation. Study 1 examined conversations following 6 preschoolers' (ages 2-4 years) causal questions in…
Descriptors: Speech Communication, Child Language, Adults, Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jipson, Jennifer L.; Gelman, Susan A. – Child Development, 2007
This study tests the firm distinction children are said to make between living and nonliving kinds. Three, 4-, and 5-year-old children and adults reasoned about whether items that varied on 3 dimensions (alive, face, behavior) had a range of properties (biological, psychological, perceptual, artifact, novel, proper names). Findings demonstrate…
Descriptors: Inferences, Differences, Young Children, Adults
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gelman, Susan A.; Heyman, Gail D.; Legare, Cristine H. – Child Development, 2007
Essentialism is the belief that certain characteristics (of individuals or categories) may be relatively stable, unchanging, likely to be present at birth, and biologically based. The current studies examined how different essentialist beliefs interrelate. For example, does thinking that a property is innate imply that the property cannot be…
Descriptors: Adults, Rhetoric, Psychological Characteristics, Social Characteristics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gelman, Susan A.; Bloom, Paul – Cognition, 2007
Generic sentences (such as "Birds lay eggs") are important in that they refer to kinds (e.g., birds as a group) rather than individuals (e.g., the birds in the henhouse). The present set of studies examined aspects of how generic nouns are understood by English speakers. Adults and children (4- and 5-year-olds) were presented with scenarios about…
Descriptors: Semantics, Sentences, Nouns, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Heyman, Gail D.; Gelman, Susan A. – Developmental Psychology, 1998
Investigated age differences from early childhood to adulthood in the capacity to understand--in a psychologically meaningful way--traits in stories wherein main characters perform actions based on a positive, negative, or incidental motive that result in an emotional consequence for another character. Found that even 5- to 6-year-olds made trait…
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Attribution Theory, Child Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Heyman, Gail D.; Phillips, Ann T.; Gelman, Susan A. – Cognition, 2003
Examined reasoning about physics principles within and across ontological kinds among 5- and 7-year-olds and adults. Found that all age groups tended to appropriately generalize what they learned across ontological kinds. Children assumed that principles learned with reference to one ontological kind were more likely to apply within that kind than…
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Children, Cognitive Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Notaro, Paul C.; Gelman, Susan A.; Zimmerman, Marc A. – Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 2002
Three studies examined 4- to- 7-year-olds' reasoning about consequences of physiological responses with origins in the mind. Results revealed that adults believed only psychological treatments are effective cures for psychogenic reactions. Young children reported that only physical treatments are effective cures for psychogenic reactions,…
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Bias, Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ahn, Woo-kyoung; Gelman, Susan A.; Amsterlaw, Jennifer A.; Hohenstein, Jill; Kalish, Charles W. – Cognition, 2000
Examined causal status effect (weighing cause features more than effect features in categorization). Presented adults and 7- to 9-year-olds animal descriptions wherein one feature caused two others. Asked which transfer item was more likely an example of novel animal. Found that both groups preferred an animal with a cause and an effect feature…
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Classification, Cognitive Development
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2