Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 4 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Reading Comprehension | 5 |
Reading Programs | 5 |
Control Groups | 3 |
Decoding (Reading) | 3 |
Experimental Groups | 3 |
Grade 1 | 3 |
Tutoring | 3 |
Achievement Gains | 2 |
Early Reading | 2 |
Experimental Programs | 2 |
Grade 3 | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Exceptional Children | 1 |
Grantee Submission | 1 |
Journal of Learning… | 1 |
Learning Disabilities… | 1 |
Learning Disability Quarterly | 1 |
Author
Fuchs, Douglas | 5 |
Fuchs, Lynn S. | 5 |
Elleman, Amy M. | 4 |
Gilbert, Jennifer K. | 4 |
Peng, Peng | 4 |
Compton, Donald L. | 3 |
Cho, Eunsoo | 2 |
Hendricks, Emma | 2 |
Kearns, Devin M. | 2 |
Kim, Wooliya | 2 |
Patton, Samuel, III | 2 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 5 |
Journal Articles | 4 |
Education Level
Early Childhood Education | 4 |
Elementary Education | 4 |
Primary Education | 4 |
Grade 1 | 3 |
Grade 3 | 2 |
Grade 2 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Intermediate Grades | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Tennessee | 1 |
Tennessee (Nashville) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Woodcock Diagnostic Reading… | 1 |
Woodcock Reading Mastery Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Fuchs, Douglas; Kearns, Devin M.; Fuchs, Lynn S.; Elleman, Amy M.; Gilbert, Jennifer K.; Patton, Samuel; Peng, Peng; Compton, Donald L. – Exceptional Children, 2019
Because of the importance of teaching reading comprehension to struggling young readers and the infrequency with which it has been implemented and evaluated, we designed a comprehensive first-grade reading comprehension program. We conducted a component analysis of the program's decoding/fluency and reading comprehension dimensions (DF and COMP),…
Descriptors: Grade 1, Reading Instruction, Reading Comprehension, Reading Programs
Peng, Peng; Fuchs, Douglas; Fuchs, Lynn S.; Cho, Eunsoo; Elleman, Amy M.; Kearns, Devin M.; Patton, Samuel, III; Compton, Donald L. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2020
We conducted a secondary analysis of data from a randomized control trial to explore this question: Does "response/no response" best characterize students' reactions to a generally efficacious first-grade reading program, or is a more nuanced characterization necessary? Data were collected on 265 at-risk readers' word reading prior to…
Descriptors: Response to Intervention, Reading Comprehension, Reading Programs, Reading Instruction
Fuchs, Douglas; Hendricks, Emma; Walsh, Meagan E.; Fuchs, Lynn S.; Gilbert, Jennifer K.; Zhang Tracy, Wen; Patton, Samuel, III; Davis-Perkins, Nicole; Kim, Wooliya; Elleman, Amy M.; Peng, Peng – Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 2018
We conducted a 14-week experimental study of 2 versions of a relatively comprehensive RC intervention that involved 50 classroom teachers, 15 tutors, and 116 children drawn in equal proportions from grades 3 and 5 in 13 schools in a large urban school district. Students were randomly assigned in equal numbers to the two tutoring conditions and a…
Descriptors: Multidimensional Scaling, Reading Comprehension, Reputation, Reading Programs
Fuchs, Douglas; Hendricks, Emma; Walsh, Meagan E.; Fuchs, Lynn S.; Gilbert, Jennifer K.; Zhang Tracy, Wen; Patton, Samuel, III.; Davis, Nicole; Kim, Wooliya; Elleman, Amy M.; Peng, Peng – Grantee Submission, 2018
We conducted a 14-week experimental study of 2 versions of a relatively comprehensive RC intervention that involved 50 classroom teachers, 15 tutors, and 120 children drawn in equal proportions from grades 3 and 5 in 13 schools in a large urban school district. Students were randomly assigned in equal numbers to the 2 tutoring conditions and a…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Multidimensional Scaling, Reputation, Reading Programs
Toste, Jessica R.; Compton, Donald L.; Fuchs, Douglas; Fuchs, Lynn S.; Gilbert, Jennifer K.; Cho, Eunsoo; Barquero, Laura A.; Bouton, Bobette D. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2014
The purpose of the current study was to examine academic and cognitive profiles of first graders who responded adequately and inadequately to intensive small-group reading intervention (Tier 2), as well as assess how these profiles differ based on the criteria used for classification of unresponsiveness. Nonresponders were identified using two…
Descriptors: Profiles, Grade 1, Intervention, Reading Programs