Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Commercialization | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Intervention | 1 |
| Program Evaluation | 1 |
| Reading Comprehension | 1 |
| Reading Tests | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
| Standards | 1 |
| Test Construction | 1 |
| Testing | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Reading Research Quarterly | 1 |
Author
| Clemens, Nathan H. | 1 |
| Fuchs, Douglas | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkClemens, Nathan H.; Fuchs, Douglas – Reading Research Quarterly, 2022
Many seem to believe that researcher-made tests are unnecessary, if not inappropriate, for evaluating reading comprehension interventions. We suggest that this view reflects a zeitgeist in which researcher-made (proximal) tests that align with the researchers' interventions are closely scrutinized and often devalued, whereas commercially developed…
Descriptors: Reading Tests, Reading Comprehension, Intervention, Test Construction
