Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Intervention | 2 |
| Coding | 1 |
| Decoding (Reading) | 1 |
| Evidence | 1 |
| High Risk Students | 1 |
| Jargon | 1 |
| Language Impairments | 1 |
| Language Research | 1 |
| Learning Disabilities | 1 |
| Literacy | 1 |
| Phoneme Grapheme… | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Foorman, Barbara R. | 2 |
| Arndt, Elissa J. | 1 |
| Ciancio, Dennis J. | 1 |
| Crawford, Elizabeth C. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Texas | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkFoorman, Barbara R.; Arndt, Elissa J.; Crawford, Elizabeth C. – Topics in Language Disorders, 2011
Currently students who struggle with language and literacy learning are classified with various labels in different states--language learning disabilities, dyslexia, specific language impairment, and specific learning disability--in spite of having similar diagnostic profiles. Drawing on the research on comprehension of written language, we…
Descriptors: Evidence, Reading Consultants, Written Language, Learning Disabilities
Foorman, Barbara R.; Ciancio, Dennis J. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2005
The article by Speece (in this issue) underscores the disappointing accuracy results of early screening for reading difficulties and argues that development conceptualized as rate of learning matters. We respond by emphasizing three points. First, the purpose of early screening could be identifying students not at risk so that instructional…
Descriptors: Reading Difficulties, Reading Instruction, Intervention, Screening Tests
