Descriptor
Source
Phi Delta Kappan | 9 |
Author
Flygare, Thomas J. | 10 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 4 |
Opinion Papers | 3 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 3 |
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Bill of Rights | 1 |
Brown v Board of Education | 1 |
First Amendment | 1 |
Fourth Amendment | 1 |
Pickering v Board of Education | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Flygare, Thomas J. – Phi Delta Kappan, 1976
A federal court held that a state law requiring one minute of meditation or prayer in the public schools is legal. (IRT)
Descriptors: Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Courts
Flygare, Thomas J. – Phi Delta Kappan, 1980
Discusses a case in which the courts upheld the school district's policies concerning the content of student publications. Concludes that perhaps the time has come that the schools can enforce rules that not only serve the legitimate interests of the schools, but also provide adequate protection for student rights. (Author/IRT)
Descriptors: Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Freedom of Speech, High Schools
Flygare, Thomas J. – Phi Delta Kappan, 1980
When the rhetoric is removed, it is clear that the students' lawyers were asserting that it is unconstitutional for school board members to resort to their own political, social, and moral views when making decisions affecting the curriculum. The courts did not agree. (Author/IRT)
Descriptors: Board of Education Role, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Curriculum
Flygare, Thomas J. – Phi Delta Kappan, 1977
Descriptors: Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Federal Courts, Freedom of Speech
Flygare, Thomas J. – Phi Delta Kappan, 1977
The Dayton decision is the clearest and most direct statement made by the Supreme Court about the necessity for closely tailoring any desegregation remedy to the scope of the constitutional violation. (Author/IRT)
Descriptors: Boards of Education, Constitutional Law, Desegregation Plans, Elementary Secondary Education
Flygare, Thomas J. – Phi Delta Kappan, 1980
This case is significant because it goes further than any other earlier decision in describing the outlines of the substantive due process concept as it applies to school discipline. (Author)
Descriptors: Constitutional Law, Corporal Punishment, Court Litigation, Due Process
Flygare, Thomas J. – Phi Delta Kappan, 1987
Presents divergent opinions of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor (for the plurality), Justice Antonin Scalia, and Justice Harry Blackmun in the Supreme Court decision to return the case of "O'Connor v. Ortega" (questioning the constitutionality of searching a public employee's office) to the district court. O'Connor rejected the notion that…
Descriptors: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Educational Administration
Flygare, Thomas J. – Phi Delta Kappan, 1986
Analyzes the United States Supreme Court's reversal of "Memphis County School Distruct v. Stachura," a District Court decision to compensate a temporarily suspended life sciences teacher for damages involving deprivation of his constitutional rights. Views this decision as one more obstacle blocking individuals' progress against…
Descriptors: Constitutional Law, Controversial Issues (Course Content), Courts, Due Process
Flygare, Thomas J. – Phi Delta Kappan, 1985
A district court decision that the firing of a bisexual counselor violated free speech and equal protection of the law was reversed by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Although the United States Supreme Court declined to review the case, Justices Brennan and Marshall wrote dissenting opinions claiming unresolved constitutional issues. (MLF)
Descriptors: Bisexuality, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Equal Protection
Flygare, Thomas J. – 1984
This paper argues that courts have tended to identify and enforce individual rights at the expense, in many instances, of the ability of school boards and legislatures to carry out what they perceive to be the will of the majority of voters in their jurisdictions. The trend emphasizing individual rights began in 1954 with the Supreme Court…
Descriptors: Board of Education Role, Civil Rights Legislation, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation