Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Advanced Placement Programs | 3 |
Test Construction | 3 |
Test Content | 3 |
Course Content | 2 |
Test Validity | 2 |
Achievement Tests | 1 |
Alignment (Education) | 1 |
Culture Fair Tests | 1 |
Equated Scores | 1 |
Equivalency Tests | 1 |
Evidence | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Ewing, Maureen | 3 |
Hamen, Cynthia | 2 |
Packman, Sheryl | 2 |
Clark, Allison | 1 |
Hendrickson, Amy | 1 |
Patterson, Brian | 1 |
Thurber, Allison Clark | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 2 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Non-Print Media | 1 |
Reference Materials - General | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
High Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Advanced Placement… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ewing, Maureen; Packman, Sheryl; Hamen, Cynthia; Thurber, Allison Clark – Applied Measurement in Education, 2010
In the last few years, the Advanced Placement (AP) Program[R] has used evidence-centered assessment design (ECD) to articulate the knowledge, skills, and abilities to be taught in the course and measured on the summative exam for four science courses, three history courses, and six world language courses; its application to calculus and English…
Descriptors: Advanced Placement Programs, Equivalency Tests, Evidence, Test Construction
Ewing, Maureen; Packman, Sheryl; Hamen, Cynthia; Clark, Allison – College Board, 2009
Presented at the Annual Meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) in San Diego, CA in April 2009. This presentation describes the methodology that was used with subject-matter experts (SMEs) to articulate the content and skills important in the domain, and then the iterative processes that were used to articulate the claims…
Descriptors: Evidence Based Practice, Advanced Placement Programs, Achievement Tests, Test Construction
Hendrickson, Amy; Patterson, Brian; Ewing, Maureen – College Board, 2010
The psychometric considerations and challenges associated with including constructed response items on tests are discussed along with how these issues affect the form assembly specifications for mixed-format exams. Reliability and validity, security and fairness, pretesting, content and skills coverage, test length and timing, weights, statistical…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Test Format, Test Construction, Test Validity