NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Luu, Kimberly; Sidhu, Ravi; Chadha, Neil K.; Eva, Kevin W. – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2023
Clinical supervisors are known to assess trainee performance idiosyncratically, causing concern about the validity of their ratings. The literature on this issue relies heavily on retrospective collection of decisions, resulting in the risk of inaccurate information regarding what actually drives raters' perceptions. Capturing in-the-moment…
Descriptors: Clinical Experience, Practicum Supervision, Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ilgen, Jonathan S.; Eva, Kevin W.; de Bruin, Anique; Cook, David A.; Regehr, Glenn – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2019
Learning to take safe and effective action in complex settings rife with uncertainty is essential for patient safety and quality care. Doing so is not easy for trainees, as they often consider certainty to be a necessary precursor for action and subsequently struggle in these settings. Understanding how skillful clinicians work comfortably when…
Descriptors: Attitudes, Beliefs, Decision Making, Physicians
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gingerich, Andrea; Ramlo, Susan E.; van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.; Eva, Kevin W.; Regehr, Glenn – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2017
Whenever multiple observers provide ratings, even of the same performance, inter-rater variation is prevalent. The resulting "idiosyncratic rater variance" is considered to be unusable error of measurement in psychometric models and is a threat to the defensibility of our assessments. Prior studies of inter-rater variation in clinical…
Descriptors: Interrater Reliability, Error of Measurement, Psychometrics, Q Methodology