Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Coding | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Computer Science Education | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Instructional Effectiveness | 1 |
| Misconceptions | 1 |
| Performance Factors | 1 |
| Programmed Tutoring | 1 |
| Programming | 1 |
| Semantics | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Computer Science Education | 1 |
Author
| Edwards, Stephen H. | 1 |
| Elmongui, Hicham G. | 1 |
| Ernst, Jeremy V. | 1 |
| Hamouda, Sally | 1 |
| Shaffer, Clifford A. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkHamouda, Sally; Edwards, Stephen H.; Elmongui, Hicham G.; Ernst, Jeremy V.; Shaffer, Clifford A. – Computer Science Education, 2020
Background and Context: Recursion in binary trees has proven to be a hard topic. There was not much research on enhancing student understanding of this topic. Objective: We present a tutorial to enhance learning through practice of recursive operations in binary trees, as it is typically taught post-CS2. Method: We identified the misconceptions…
Descriptors: Computer Science Education, Programming, Coding, Student Attitudes
