Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Artificial Intelligence | 2 |
Learning Processes | 2 |
Models | 2 |
Natural Language Processing | 2 |
Task Analysis | 2 |
Automation | 1 |
Classification | 1 |
Computational Linguistics | 1 |
Computer Software | 1 |
Documentation | 1 |
Error Patterns | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Grantee Submission | 2 |
Author
Dascalu, Mihai | 2 |
McNamara, Danielle S. | 2 |
Allen, Laura K. | 1 |
Botarleanu, Robert-Mihai | 1 |
Crossley, Scott Andrew | 1 |
Newton, Natalie N. | 1 |
Nicula, Bogdan | 1 |
Orcutt, Ellen | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 2 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Botarleanu, Robert-Mihai; Dascalu, Mihai; Allen, Laura K.; Crossley, Scott Andrew; McNamara, Danielle S. – Grantee Submission, 2022
Automated scoring of student language is a complex task that requires systems to emulate complex and multi-faceted human evaluation criteria. Summary scoring brings an additional layer of complexity to automated scoring because it involves two texts of differing lengths that must be compared. In this study, we present our approach to automate…
Descriptors: Automation, Scoring, Documentation, Likert Scales
Nicula, Bogdan; Dascalu, Mihai; Newton, Natalie N.; Orcutt, Ellen; McNamara, Danielle S. – Grantee Submission, 2021
Learning to paraphrase supports both writing ability and reading comprehension, particularly for less skilled learners. As such, educational tools that integrate automated evaluations of paraphrases can be used to provide timely feedback to enhance learner paraphrasing skills more efficiently and effectively. Paraphrase identification is a popular…
Descriptors: Computational Linguistics, Feedback (Response), Classification, Learning Processes