Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Source
| Grantee Submission | 2 |
Author
| Danielle S. McNamara | 2 |
| Daniel P. Feller | 1 |
| Joseph P. Magliano | 1 |
| Kathryn S. McCarthy | 1 |
| Laura Allen | 1 |
| Lauren Flynn | 1 |
| Mihai Dascalu | 1 |
| Philippe Dessus | 1 |
| Scott A. Crossley | 1 |
| Stefan Trausan-Matu | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
| Two Year Colleges | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full text
Direct linkJoseph P. Magliano; Lauren Flynn; Daniel P. Feller; Kathryn S. McCarthy; Danielle S. McNamara; Laura Allen – Grantee Submission, 2022
The goal of this study was to assess the relationships between computational approaches to analyzing constructed responses made during reading and individual differences in the foundational skills of reading in college readers. We also explored if these relationships were consistent across texts and samples collected at different institutions and…
Descriptors: Semantics, Computational Linguistics, Individual Differences, Reading Materials
Mihai Dascalu; Scott A. Crossley; Danielle S. McNamara; Philippe Dessus; Stefan Trausan-Matu – Grantee Submission, 2018
A critical task for tutors is to provide learners with suitable reading materials in terms of difficulty. The challenge of this endeavor is increased by students' individual variability and the multiple levels in which complexity can vary, thus arguing for the necessity of automated systems to support teachers. This chapter describes…
Descriptors: Reading Materials, Difficulty Level, Natural Language Processing, Artificial Intelligence
