Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Essays | 1 |
| Evaluators | 1 |
| High School Students | 1 |
| Intelligent Tutoring Systems | 1 |
| Knowledge Level | 1 |
| Reading Comprehension | 1 |
| Reading Tests | 1 |
| Scoring | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Grantee Submission | 1 |
Author
| Crossley, Scott A. | 1 |
| McNamara, Danielle S. | 1 |
| Roscoe, Rod D. | 1 |
| Snow, Erica L. | 1 |
| Varner, Laura K. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| High Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textRoscoe, Rod D.; Crossley, Scott A.; Snow, Erica L.; Varner, Laura K.; McNamara, Danielle S. – Grantee Submission, 2014
Automated essay scoring tools are often criticized on the basis of construct validity. Specifically, it has been argued that computational scoring algorithms may be unaligned to higher-level indicators of quality writing, such as writers' demonstrated knowledge and understanding of the essay topics. In this paper, we consider how and whether the…
Descriptors: Correlation, Essays, Scoring, Writing Evaluation
