Descriptor
Higher Education | 3 |
Oral Interpretation | 3 |
Debate | 2 |
Judges | 2 |
Audience Awareness | 1 |
Communication Research | 1 |
Debate Format | 1 |
Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
Guidelines | 1 |
Literature | 1 |
Manuscripts | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Cronn-Mills, Daniel | 3 |
Cook, Jeff | 1 |
Golden, Alfred | 1 |
Publication Type
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 3 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Cronn-Mills, Daniel; Golden, Alfred – 1997
One of the frustrations students new to intercollegiate competitive oral interpretation experience is having to learn the "unwritten rules" for the events. These rules are neither intrinsically negative nor positive. Any of the practices embodied in these rules may be used effectively by a student performing an oral interpretation of…
Descriptors: Guidelines, Higher Education, Literature, Oral Interpretation
Cronn-Mills, Daniel – 1995
Understanding communication (of which individual events is a part) requires a triangle among theory-practice-criticism, and any missing component dramatically hinders understanding and ability. Students compete in, and judges judge, forensics to better enhance communication understanding and abilities. The process of oral interpretation requires a…
Descriptors: Audience Awareness, Debate, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education
Cronn-Mills, Daniel; Cook, Jeff – 1995
A study examined the beliefs and attitudes of students, coaches, and judges on the use of manuscripts at the college level in oral interpretation events (prose, drama, program oral interpretation, dramatic duo, and poetry). Survey data were collected from students, coach-judges, and hired judges participating in a Midwestern forensics tournament…
Descriptors: Communication Research, Debate, Debate Format, Higher Education