NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stefanco, Carolyn J.; Lloyd, Victoria C.; Braxton, John M. – Innovative Higher Education, 2022
This article develops a two way of a scholarship of practice for independent college and university presidents: one loop from practitioners to researchers and the other loop from researchers to practitioners. We used the results of survey completed by presidents of independent institutions in California, New York, and Tennessee to develop this…
Descriptors: Private Colleges, College Presidents, Theory Practice Relationship, Researchers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Harrington, Christine; Lyken-Segosebe, Dawn; Braxton, John M.; Nespoli, Lawrence A. – New Directions for Community Colleges, 2021
This study evaluated the connection between community college faculty engagement in the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) and student success by investigating the frequency of individual community college faculty members engagement in activities that comprise the SoTL categories of classroom research and pedagogical content knowledge.
Descriptors: Community Colleges, College Faculty, Classroom Research, Pedagogical Content Knowledge
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Lyken-Segosebe, Dawn; Braxton, John M. – International Journal of Higher Education, 2021
Vice chancellors of public universities in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) region face a myriad of challenges that require research- and data-driven decision-making. This paper presents a decision-making model for college and university leadership - The Two-Way Practitioner-Researcher Loop. This scholarship of practice has the…
Descriptors: College Administration, Decision Making, Data Analysis, Barriers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Park, Toby J.; Braxton, John M. – Journal of Higher Education, 2013
This study was conducted using cluster analysis as well as discriminant analysis to empirically identify types of faculty based on their patterns of performance of scholarship reflective of one or more of Boyer's four domains of scholarship. (Contains 5 tables and 1 figure.)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Teacher Characteristics, Scholarship, Discriminant Analysis
Braxton, John M.; Proper, Eve; Bayer, Alan E. – Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011
A faculty member publishes an article without offering coauthorship to a graduate assistant who has made a substantial conceptual or methodological contribution to the article. A professor does not permit graduate students to express viewpoints different from her own. A graduate student close to finishing his dissertation cannot reach his…
Descriptors: Graduate Students, Socialization, Role Models, Academic Rank (Professional)
Coopersmith, Georgia A.; Braxton, John M. – 1990
The norms of science define appropriate and inappropriate scholarly or research role performance. The four norms described in this study are (1) universalism: research is assessed on its merit, not particularistic criteria; (2) commonality: research must be made public and shared with the research community; (3) disinterestedness: research is…
Descriptors: Behavior Standards, College Faculty, Conformity, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Braxton, John M.; Berger, Joseph B. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1996
A summary of articles on the relationship between faculty research and college teaching finds that faculty scholarship does not adversely affect teaching norms, teacher effectiveness, student cognitive development, or currency of course content. However, research activity affects two teaching dimensions detrimentally: rigor of course examinations…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Conflict of Interest, Faculty Publishing, Faculty Workload
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Braxton, John M. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1996
Three perspectives on the link between college faculty research and teaching effectiveness (null, conflict, and complementarily) are discussed, and empirical support for each is examined. Both null and complementarily perspectives receive modest affirmation, whereas the conflict perspective garners little support. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Conflict of Interest, Faculty Publishing, Faculty Workload