NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Delineating Scholarly Types of College and University Faculty Members
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Park, Toby J.; Braxton, John M. – Journal of Higher Education, 2013
This study was conducted using cluster analysis as well as discriminant analysis to empirically identify types of faculty based on their patterns of performance of scholarship reflective of one or more of Boyer's four domains of scholarship. (Contains 5 tables and 1 figure.)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Teacher Characteristics, Scholarship, Discriminant Analysis
Public Trust, Research Activity, and the Ideal of Service to Students as Clients of Teaching.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Braxton, John M.; Berger, Joseph B. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1996
A summary of articles on the relationship between faculty research and college teaching finds that faculty scholarship does not adversely affect teaching norms, teacher effectiveness, student cognitive development, or currency of course content. However, research activity affects two teaching dimensions detrimentally: rigor of course examinations…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Conflict of Interest, Faculty Publishing, Faculty Workload
Contrasting Perspectives on the Relationship Between Teaching and Research.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Braxton, John M. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1996
Three perspectives on the link between college faculty research and teaching effectiveness (null, conflict, and complementarily) are discussed, and empirical support for each is examined. Both null and complementarily perspectives receive modest affirmation, whereas the conflict perspective garners little support. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Conflict of Interest, Faculty Publishing, Faculty Workload