Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Behavior Standards | 2 |
| Grading | 2 |
| Moral Values | 2 |
| Planning | 2 |
| Assignments | 1 |
| Bachelors Degrees | 1 |
| Beginning Teachers | 1 |
| Bullying | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| College Instruction | 1 |
| Colleges | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Braxton, John M. | 2 |
| Lyken-Segosebe, Dawn | 1 |
| Min, Yunkyung | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkLyken-Segosebe, Dawn; Min, Yunkyung; Braxton, John M. – New Directions for Higher Education, 2012
Four-year colleges and universities that espouse teaching as their primary mission bear a responsibility to safeguard the welfare of their students as clients of teaching. This responsibility takes the form of a moral imperative. Faculty members hold considerable autonomy in the professional choices they make in their teaching. As a consequence,…
Descriptors: Grading, Guidelines, Assignments, Student Welfare
Peer reviewedBraxton, John M.; And Others – Research in Higher Education, 1995
A study of 250 new teaching assistants and 122 tenure-track faculty investigated their endorsement of 4 norms defining appropriate and inappropriate teaching behavior: (1) interpersonal disregard; (2) particularistic grading; (3) moral turpitude; and (4) inadequate planning. Both groups accorded the norms similar levels of impropriety. Questions…
Descriptors: Beginning Teachers, Behavior Standards, College Instruction, Entry Workers
