NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Location
New Jersey2
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 16 to 19 of 19 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Attali, Yigal – ETS Research Report Series, 2004
Contrary to common belief, reliability estimates of number-right multiple-choice tests are not inflated by speededness. Because examinees guess on questions when they run out of time, the responses to these questions show less consistency with the responses of other questions, and the reliability of the test will be decreased. The surprising…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Timed Tests, Test Reliability, Guessing (Tests)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Attali, Yigal – ETS Research Report Series, 2007
This study examined the construct validity of the "e-rater"® automated essay scoring engine as an alternative to human scoring in the context of TOEFL® essay writing. Analyses were based on a sample of students who repeated the TOEFL within a short time period. Two "e-rater" scores were investigated in this study, the first…
Descriptors: Construct Validity, Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, English (Second Language)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Attali, Yigal; Burstein, Jill – Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2006
E-rater[R] has been used by the Educational Testing Service for automated essay scoring since 1999. This paper describes a new version of e-rater (V.2) that is different from other automated essay scoring systems in several important respects. The main innovations of e-rater V.2 are a small, intuitive, and meaningful set of features used for…
Descriptors: Educational Testing, Test Scoring Machines, Scoring, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Attali, Yigal; Burstein, Jill – ETS Research Report Series, 2005
The e-rater® system has been used by ETS for automated essay scoring since 1999. This paper describes a new version of e-rater (v.2.0) that differs from the previous one (v.1.3) with regard to the feature set and model building approach. The paper describes the new version, compares the new and previous versions in terms of performance, and…
Descriptors: Essay Tests, Automation, Scoring, Comparative Analysis
« Previous Page | Next Page
Pages: 1  |  2