NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Attali, Yigal; Saldivia, Luis; Jackson, Carol; Schuppan, Fred; Wanamaker, Wilbur – ETS Research Report Series, 2014
Previous investigations of the ability of content experts and test developers to estimate item difficulty have, for themost part, produced disappointing results. These investigations were based on a noncomparative method of independently rating the difficulty of items. In this article, we argue that, by eliciting comparative judgments of…
Descriptors: Test Items, Difficulty Level, Comparative Analysis, College Entrance Examinations
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Attali, Yigal; Laitusis, Cara; Stone, Elizabeth – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2016
There are many reasons to believe that open-ended (OE) and multiple-choice (MC) items elicit different cognitive demands of students. However, empirical evidence that supports this view is lacking. In this study, we investigated the reactions of test takers to an interactive assessment with immediate feedback and answer-revision opportunities for…
Descriptors: Test Items, Questioning Techniques, Differences, Student Reaction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Attali, Yigal – ETS Research Report Series, 2004
Contrary to common belief, reliability estimates of number-right multiple-choice tests are not inflated by speededness. Because examinees guess on questions when they run out of time, the responses to these questions show less consistency with the responses of other questions, and the reliability of the test will be decreased. The surprising…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Timed Tests, Test Reliability, Guessing (Tests)