NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Arreola, Raoul A. – Engineering Education, 1979
Presents a variety of examples for developing a faculty evaluation system and gathering data about faculty members' activities. An equation is given that can be used to compute merit pay. The system for evaluation is designed to promote individualization in many settings. (SA)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Performance Specifications
Arreola, Raoul A. – 1979
In response to an increasing demand for faculty evaluation, focus is on elements of a successful evaluation program. It is suggested that faculty must be consulted in order to arrive at a mutually agreed upon structure, incorporating such areas as which sources should provide the information or data on which the evaluation will be based. Another…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Computation, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Arreola, Raoul A. – New Directions for Community Colleges, 1983
Examines obstacles to and errors in establishing faculty evaluation and development programs. Presents 12 guidelines for overcoming obstacles and avoiding errors, including the identification and enlistment of high-level administrative support; responsiveness to faculty concerns; and the establishment of development centers, advisory boards, and…
Descriptors: Administrative Problems, College Faculty, Community Colleges, Evaluation Methods
Arreola, Raoul A. – 1995
This handbook provides a practical model for developing and using a comprehensive faculty evaluating system that responds to the specific needs, concerns, and characteristics of the faculty and administration of an individual academic unit. It outlines an eight-step procedure that focuses on the determination of: (1) the faculty role model; (2)…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs, Evaluation Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Arreola, Raoul A. – College Student Journal, 1973
Determines that the factor structure of the instructional model measured by the Michigan State University Student Instructional Rating System (SIRS) form could be replicated by an adapted version of the SIRS instrument at Florida State University. (Author)
Descriptors: Course Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Factor Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Arreola, Raoul A. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1987
Student governments played an important role in the development of faculty evaluation programs. The value of student governments in today's comprehensive faculty evaluation programs is discussed. Student evaluation, student ratings, and faculty evaluation are defined. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Peer Evaluation
Arreola, Raoul A. – 2000
This handbook offers a practical model for developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system that responds to the specific needs, concerns, and characteristics of faculty and administration in an individual academic unit. The eight steps of the model are: (1) determining the faculty role model; (2) determining faculty role model parameter…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Arreola, Raoul A. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1987
A procedure for developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation program is described with examples of various components. Procedures for implementing such a program are discussed. Determining and weighting faculty roles, defining roles and gaining information, and arriving at a matrix are described. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Community Colleges, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation