Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Benchmarking | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computation | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| Item Response Theory | 1 |
| Judges | 1 |
| Probability | 1 |
| Reading Tests | 1 |
| Standard Setting (Scoring) | 1 |
| Students | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Applied Measurement in… | 1 |
Author
| Andrich, David | 1 |
| Heldsinger, Sandra | 1 |
| Humphry, Stephen | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Australia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkHumphry, Stephen; Heldsinger, Sandra; Andrich, David – Applied Measurement in Education, 2014
One of the best-known methods for setting a benchmark standard on a test is that of Angoff and its modifications. When scored dichotomously, judges estimate the probability that a benchmark student has of answering each item correctly. As in most methods of standard setting, it is assumed implicitly that the unit of the latent scale of the…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Standard Setting (Scoring), Judges, Item Response Theory
