Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Accountability | 2 |
| Teacher Evaluation | 2 |
| Validity | 2 |
| Value Added Models | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Bias | 1 |
| Court Litigation | 1 |
| Educational Assessment | 1 |
| Educational Change | 1 |
| Educational Policy | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Policy | 2 |
Author
| Amrein-Beardsley, Audrey | 2 |
| Close, Kevin | 1 |
| Holloway, Jessica | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| New Mexico | 1 |
| New York | 1 |
| Tennessee | 1 |
| Texas (Houston) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkAmrein-Beardsley, Audrey; Close, Kevin – Educational Policy, 2021
Ongoing or recently completed across the United States are a series of lawsuits via which teacher plaintiffs are contesting how they are being evaluated using value-added models (VAMs) as part of states'/districts' teacher accountability systems. To investigate the empirical and pragmatic matters addressed in court, researchers conducted a case…
Descriptors: Value Added Models, Court Litigation, Teacher Evaluation, Reliability
Amrein-Beardsley, Audrey; Holloway, Jessica – Educational Policy, 2019
Despite the concerns regarding value-added models (VAMs), advocates hold strong to VAMs' theoretical strengths and potentials, while adopting a set of agreed-upon albeit "heroic" set of assumptions, without research in support. These assumptions transcend promotional, policy, media, and research-based pieces, but they have never been…
Descriptors: Value Added Models, Teacher Evaluation, Accountability, Educational Change
