Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| College Students | 1 |
| Educational Games | 1 |
| Error Correction | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Intelligent Tutoring Systems | 1 |
| Likert Scales | 1 |
| Path Analysis | 1 |
| Performance | 1 |
| Persuasive Discourse | 1 |
| Policy | 1 |
| Policy Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of the Learning… | 1 |
Author
| Aleven, Vincent | 1 |
| Carver, Sharon M. | 1 |
| Easterday, Matthew W. | 1 |
| Scheines, Richard | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkEasterday, Matthew W.; Aleven, Vincent; Scheines, Richard; Carver, Sharon M. – Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2017
How might we balance assistance and penalties to intelligent tutors and educational games that increase learning and interest? We created two versions of an educational game for learning policy argumentation called Policy World. The game (only) version provided minimal feedback and penalized students for errors whereas the game+tutor version…
Descriptors: Educational Games, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Policy, Persuasive Discourse
