Descriptor
Source
| New Directions for Teaching… | 4 |
Author
| Aleamoni, Lawrence M. | 10 |
| Arreola, Raoul | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Opinion Papers | 3 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 2 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textAleamoni, Lawrence M. – 1973
Of the various systems developed for student evaluation of course and instructor, the Illinois Course Evaluation Questionnaire (CEQ) has perhaps the most extensive reliability and validity data to support it as well as the most extensive norm data base. The CEQ is used to collect student attitudes towards a course and instructor and its purpose is…
Descriptors: Course Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Aleamoni, Lawrence M. – 1974
The present study was designed to assess the effects of a combination of feedback and personal consultations using college student evaluations on faculty performance. Student evaluation feedback and personal consultations were conducted at least a semester before any follow-up data was gathered. The results indicate that providing computerized…
Descriptors: College Students, Faculty Evaluation, Feedback, Higher Education
Aleamoni, Lawrence M.; And Others – 1972
The purpose of this study was to determine if a) "Folklore" about a teacher contributes to his ratings on a course evaluation questionnaire and b) changes in students' attitudes during the course of instruction can be determined with a course evaluation questionnaire. Multivariate techniques and discriminate analysis were employed. The results…
Descriptors: Bibliographies, College Faculty, Course Evaluation, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewedArreola, Raoul; Aleamoni, Lawrence M. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1990
When faculty evaluation systems are proposed, students, faculty, and administrators often think only of questionnaires and assignment of data-processing tasks. Much more must be considered, including balancing the needs of all constituencies, designing student-rating forms and administration procedures, and the treatment and uses of the…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Educational Improvement, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Aleamoni, Lawrence M. – 1980
In response to the problem of developing a comprehensive system of evaluation to improve and reward instructional effectiveness that is acceptable to both the academic and administrative arms of an institution, this paper presents a series of recommendations comprising a possible approach to the problem. After providing a rationale for a…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Community Colleges, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development
Peer reviewedAleamoni, Lawrence M. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1987
Eight of the most common faculty concerns about student evaluations of instruction are discussed: inconsistent student judgments, the perception that only colleagues are qualified to evaluate peers' instruction, student-rating schemes as popularity contests, unreliable and invalid student-rating forms, etc. Research shows that faculty concerns are…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Educational Research, Faculty Evaluation
Aleamoni, Lawrence M. – 1972
The Illinois Course Evaluation Questionnaire (CEQ) is an instrument used to collect student attitudes towards a course. Its purpose is to enable faculty members to collect evaluative information about their traching. The data are collected and processed by section but may also be processed by course, department, college, etc. The student responses…
Descriptors: College Students, Course Evaluation, Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedAleamoni, Lawrence M. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1987
Suggestions on how to develop comprehensive systems of instructional improvement and evaluation are offered. In order to measure and evaluate instructional effectiveness accurately, criteria and guidelines for that evaluation must be set up. This first step is accomplished most effectively at the departmental level. (MLW)
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Administrators, College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedAleamoni, Lawrence M. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1987
Issues and developments in instructional development and evaluation are discussed including: a comprehensive system of instructional evaluation needs to be established with various components differentially weighted at the departmental level; student ratings should be only one of the components; instructional development consultants should provide…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Consultants, Faculty Development
Aleamoni, Lawrence M. – 1974
Seven typical faculty concerns about the appropriateness of using ratings of instructor and instruction are examined. These are summarized in terms of common observations frequently expressed by faculty: (1) Students cannot make consistent judgments because of their immaturity, lack of experience, and capriciousness; and a widely held belief is…
Descriptors: College Students, Conference Reports, Course Evaluation, Faculty Evaluation
