NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sidi, Yael; Ophir, Yael; Ackerman, Rakefet – Metacognition and Learning, 2016
Screen inferiority in performance and metacognitive processes has been repeatedly found with text learning. Common explanations for screen inferiority relate to technological and physiological disadvantages associated with extensive reading on screen. However, recent studies point to lesser recruitment of mental effort on screen than on paper.…
Descriptors: Mass Media Effects, Metacognition, Experiments, Problem Solving
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Koriat, Asher; Nussinson, Ravit; Ackerman, Rakefet – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2014
In self-paced learning, when the regulation of study effort is goal driven (e.g., allocated to different items according to their relative importance), judgments of learning (JOLs) increase with study time. When regulation is data driven (e.g., determined by the ease of committing the item to memory), JOLs decrease with study time (Koriat,…
Descriptors: Learning, Evaluative Thinking, Study Habits, Pacing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ackerman, Rakefet; Goldsmith, Morris – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2011
Despite immense technological advances, learners still prefer studying text from printed hardcopy rather than from computer screens. Subjective and objective differences between on-screen and on-paper learning were examined in terms of a set of cognitive and metacognitive components, comprising a "Metacognitive Learning Regulation…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Prediction, Metacognition, Program Effectiveness