Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Bias | 1 |
| Educational Quality | 1 |
| Educational Research | 1 |
| Educational Technology | 1 |
| Effect Size | 1 |
| Evidence Based Practice | 1 |
| Meta Analysis | 1 |
| Scores | 1 |
| Synthesis | 1 |
Source
| Australasian Journal of… | 1 |
Author
| Abrami, Philip C. | 1 |
| Bernard, Robert M. | 1 |
| Borokhovski, Evgueni | 1 |
| Pickup, David I. | 1 |
| Schmid, Richard F. | 1 |
| Tamim, Rana M. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkTamim, Rana M.; Borokhovski, Evgueni; Bernard, Robert M.; Schmid, Richard F.; Abrami, Philip C.; Pickup, David I. – Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2021
As the empirical literature in educational technology continues to grow, meta-analyses are increasingly being used to synthesise research to inform practice. However, not all meta-analyses are equal. To examine their evolution over the past 30 years, this study systematically analysed the quality of 52 meta-analyses (1988-2017) on educational…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Educational Quality, Educational Technology, Scores
