NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)2
Audience
Researchers51
Administrators29
Practitioners29
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Beginning Postsecondary…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 51 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Padgett, Ryan D.; Salisbury, Mark H.; An, Brian P.; Pascarella, Ernest T. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 2010
The sophisticated analytical techniques available to institutional researchers give them an array of procedures to estimate a causal effect using observational data. But as many quantitative researchers have discovered, access to a wider selection of statistical tools does not necessarily ensure construction of a better analytical model. Moreover,…
Descriptors: Institutional Research, Researchers, Statistical Analysis, Models
Fossum, Donna; Eiseman, Elisa; Moreno, Connie S.; Painter, Lawrence S.; Blume-Kohout, Margaret E. – RAND Corporation, 2009
The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 expressly gave colleges, universities, and other nonprofit entities the right, which had previously been presumptively held by the federal government itself, to patent inventions resulting from federally funded research and development (R&D) activities they conduct. In the nearly three decades since the Bayh-Dole Act…
Descriptors: Research and Development, Intellectual Property, Federal Government, Public Agencies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McKinney, E, Bernadette; Hindera, John J. – Research in Higher Education, 1992
The structure and process of college institutional research is compared with three different ways in which science is conceptualized. It is concluded that, although institutional research has much in common with science, it is distinct because the dynamic nature of institutional research prevents development of a cohesive body of knowledge.…
Descriptors: College Administration, Comparative Analysis, Epistemology, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Whiteley, Meredith A.; Stage, Frances K. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1987
The widespread use of comparative data can lead to problems on a campus unless the data are systematically incorporated in the institutional planning cycle. A model has been developed to alleviate a number of problems and increase the power of comparison as a management tool. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Planning, Comparative Analysis, Data Interpretation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hutten, Leah R. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1984
Because a microcomputer system can be an expensive acquisition, the purchase decision needs to be made carefully. Steps to purchasing a microcomputer include: evaluating the data and word processing needs of the office, determining needs being met with existing capabilities, and making a cost-benefit comparison among systems. (MLW)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Software, Evaluation, Guidelines
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Orr, Dominic – Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 2004
This paper argues that research assessment is of increasing importance as an instrument of New Public Management and within the context of efforts to establish a European Research Area. Specifically, it compares the procedures of research assessment in the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Ireland and Germany in an attempt to distil basic design…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Comparative Analysis, Research Universities, Institutional Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Brinkman, Paul T.; Teeter, Deborah J. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1987
Institutional comparison groups can be selected in several ways, depending on the comparison issue. The method chosen involves both technical and political considerations. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Data Analysis, Data Interpretation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hathaway, Russel S. – Research in Higher Education, 1995
This article suggests that the choice by institutional researchers to use qualitative or quantitative research is often dictated by time, money, resources, and staff and not necessarily with an understanding of the underlying philosophical assumptions structuring beliefs about methodology, knowledge, and reality. These underlying assumptions are…
Descriptors: Beliefs, Comparative Analysis, Decision Making, Epistemology
Mannering, Linda W.; McKinney, Richard L. – 1983
The paper sets the stage for the effective and efficient use of computers in institutional research. The microcomputer and the mainframe computer are contrasted for those researchers who have a choice of where to process data. General computer use, specific microcomputer and mainframe computing guidelines, and an application utilizing both…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computers, Data Analysis, Data Processing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dunn, John A., Jr. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1987
Setting up a successful interinstitutional data-sharing project involves commonsense guidelines: be clear about what is wanted, take advantage of what already exists, use appropriate technology, staff adequately, recognize institutional differences, and concentrate on achieving insight rather than precision. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Data Collection, Disclosure, Higher Education
Smith, Theresa – 1991
This paper documents how the University of Oklahoma developed discipline cost indices which it then used in its budget allocation process. In order to overcome the interinstitutional comparison problems between universities which use different reporting and accounting methods, discipline cost indices were derived using data collected through the…
Descriptors: Budgeting, Comparative Analysis, Cost Indexes, Credits
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McCoy, Marilyn – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1987
Comparison is inherent to system and state coordination activities and is valuable for overall review and for identifying differential needs. A variety of factors affect interinstitutional comparisons, and close cooperation between boards and institutions can increase the effectiveness of the process. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Planning, Comparative Analysis, Higher Education, Institutional Characteristics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, Theresa Y. – Research in Higher Education, 1992
The derivation of discipline cost indexes, developed to permit accurate interinstitutional comparisons of relative costs among disciplines, is explained using expenditure data from five peer institutions. How the indexes have been used in one research university's budget allocation process is then described. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Budgeting, College Administration, Comparative Analysis, Cost Indexes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ewell, Peter T. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1985
Successful outcomes assessment programs have many common characteristics. Institutional researchers should examine these signs of success and use them as guides for developing their own campus programs. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Educational Assessment, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Litwin, James L. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1985
Racial and sexual stereotyping and harassment persist on today's campus, and second generation reforms and changes must be made. Public research on racism and sexism seems to have been done mostly by academic and not by institutional researchers. Some reasons for this are discussed. (MLW)
Descriptors: Campuses, Change, Comparative Analysis, Higher Education
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4